All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
Cc: Netfilter Developer <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Use of Kernel Headers
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:48:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4123C0AA.7080708@jg555.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408182200120.23460@filer.marasystems.com>

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Jim Gifford wrote:
>
>> So would the proper course of action to be to remove the kernel 
>> directory from the iptables Makefile? or is there more to it.
>
>
> Make it optional in the Makefile and make sure 
> include/linux/netfilter* is up to date.
>
> There is still value in allowing iptables to compile using the kernel 
> headers, especially so during development of a new extensions but also 
> to better match the kernel tree.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
Doesn't patch-o-matic update the ones in iptables-version/include/linux?
    So the the kernel and the iptables are built from the same headers? 
(Is this desired)
   
Or would it benefit iptables to include all the updated headers in 
iptables-version/include/linux?

I don't mean to be pest on this, I just want the best solution possible 
for anyone who uses iptables.

-- 
----
Jim Gifford
maillist@jg555.com

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-18 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-17 21:10 Use of Kernel Headers Jim Gifford
2004-08-17 23:32 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-08-18  5:36   ` Jim Gifford
2004-08-18 19:00     ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-08-18 19:25       ` Jim Gifford
2004-08-18 20:03         ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-08-18 20:48           ` Jim Gifford [this message]
2004-08-18 20:51             ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-08-18 21:01               ` Jim Gifford
2004-08-18 22:30   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-08-21  6:47     ` Jim Gifford
2004-08-21  9:30       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-08-21 14:53         ` Tobias DiPasquale
2004-08-21 15:13           ` Henrik Nordstrom
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-17 20:40 Jim Gifford
2004-08-17 21:00 ` Antony Stone
2004-08-17 21:09   ` Jim Gifford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4123C0AA.7080708@jg555.com \
    --to=maillist@jg555.com \
    --cc=hno@marasystems.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.