From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Gifford Subject: Re: Use of Kernel Headers Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:01:09 -0700 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <4123C395.8080402@jg555.com> References: <4122743A.7020309@jg555.com> <4122EADA.7030501@jg555.com> <4123AD42.8050803@jg555.com> <4123C0AA.7080708@jg555.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developer Return-path: To: Henrik Nordstrom In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Jim Gifford wrote: > >> Doesn't patch-o-matic update the ones in iptables-version/include/linux? > > > Nope. > >> So the the kernel and the iptables are built from the same headers? >> (Is this desired) > > > Today yes, and probably desired while building with patch-o-matic > patches applied. > >> Or would it benefit iptables to include all the updated headers in >> iptables-version/include/linux? > > > This would make things more clean cut separation between kernel and > userspace. > > Regards > Henrik > So now what do we do to get these changes made, or is it going to be a distro specific thing? -- ---- Jim Gifford maillist@jg555.com