From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Beshers Subject: Re: viewprinting: what format should views be stored in? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:47:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4123CE63.5040606@comcast.net> References: <20040818075216.B920D15DBC@mail03.powweb.com> <4123A1F2.1010001@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <4123A1F2.1010001@slaphack.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: David Masover Cc: David Dabbs , reiser@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com David Masover wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Dabbs wrote: > | If you only have three months to prove a concept and obtain continued > | funding, then I agree with Hans's preference for reusing as much > | existing work as possible. Adapting Hans's statement regarding > I've also been lurking and not reading too much, but here's my thought: > It is far more important to create code which can easily be re-used in > the future than to re-use code that you have now. > Point taken, but based on my initial reading I think that there is more to be saved and than redone to improve the re-use of the existing code.