no sir. the versions were correct. and the reboot-patch was applied
to the 2.4.24-1um kernel - this i originally reported as fixed, but
in later runs it showed up again... sigh.

the errors reported were those versions w/patches mentioned + all
our mods. more recent testing with just kernel.org + UML leads
to believe this is something we're inducing... so should not be
reported against what everyone else is playing with.

Jeff Dike wrote:

> dbahi@enterasys.com said:
> 
>>I withdraw this error report against 2.4.26-3um against any plain
>>vanilla UML kernel for that matter. 
> 
> 
> Is it possible you were mistaken about the versions, or whether the 
> reboot-signals patch was present?
> 
> 				Jeff
>