From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: "Vladimir I. Umnov" <uvi@ezmail.ru>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Low perfomance of RAID0,RAID5, RAID+LVM on 2.6
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4124CCF5.8010201@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040819193200.27c97a4e@vovapc.kpml.int>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Vladimir I. Umnov wrote:
|HW: chipset 875WPE, P4 2.4HT, 3 SATA WD 160JD, 1 ATA Samsung 80Gb.
|SW: kernel 2.6.6, libata drivers for PROMISE S150 TX4.
|CONFIG: 256K readahead on all drives.
| sda1,sdb1,sdc1->RAID0 (md0)
| sda2,sdb2,sdc2,hda1->RAID5 (md1)
| about 20 partitions on LVM2 with xfs,ext3,reiserfs
| chunksize on md0, md1 = 256k - this was optimal with 2.6.0test3 about
| year ago.
|
|Theoretically RAID0 read speed should be nearly read speed of one
|drive multiply to number of drives, but I have:
|dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/null gives about 44 Mb/s on all drives (but on
|sii3112 ide driver with WD 160JD about 55Mb/s and on libata the same
|44)
I use my arrays for large video files so large readahead is good.
I use blockdev on the lvms:
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/video_vg/video_lv
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/video_vg/huge_lv
the md device:
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/md0
and the raw devices
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sda
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sdb
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sdc
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/sdd
/sbin/blockdev --setra 4096 /dev/hdb
HTH
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBJMz08LvjTle4P1gRAkfpAJ9XA17vexSqmcN0LVFZOx0Dxik/BQCgjMk+
oAslumzTWosxF9WqnDXln3k=
=C3uO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-19 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 15:32 Low perfomance of RAID0,RAID5, RAID+LVM on 2.6 Vladimir I. Umnov
2004-08-19 15:53 ` David Greaves [this message]
2004-08-19 17:26 ` Guy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-19 18:12 Rechenberg, Andrew
2004-08-20 16:11 ` Vladimir I. Umnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4124CCF5.8010201@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uvi@ezmail.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.