From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Beshers <gbeshers@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: viewprinting: what format should views be stored in?
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:08:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4125E9A0.5060600@comcast.net>
References: <20040819074027.8429715D94@mail03.powweb.com> <41248D43.3040905@dgreaves.com> <4124D09A.1060208@comcast.net> <4124E408.3090405@dgreaves.com> <41259FBF.5040308@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-20430-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <41259FBF.5040308@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, david@dabbs.net


I used "presentation mask" for "source mask", i.e., something that was
portable and nominally human readable. I am anticipating a compilation
process to achieve performance.

Let us go with mask for now: source and compiled modifiers when
clarity is needed.

Hans Reiser wrote:

> David Greaves wrote:
>
>>
>> David
>> PS can I offer 'mask specification' (shortened to maskspec above) 
>> instead of 'presentation mask' for the glossary.
>>
>>
> Glossary? of?
>
> Instead of mask specification, just say mask.
>
> I think I like mask more than view....
>
> Hans
>