From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at (viefep16-int.chello.at [213.46.255.17]) by mail.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id A8907142FF for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:10:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wollmersdorfer.at ([212.186.65.148]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20040820140955.JGHS14200.viefep16-int.chello.at@wollmersdorfer.at> for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:09:55 +0200 Message-ID: <41260639.7030806@wollmersdorfer.at> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:10:01 +0200 From: Helmut Wollmersdorfer MIME-Version: 1.0 To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Re: drbd Frage zu secondary vs primary; drbddisk status problem References: <20040819110202.GO9601@marowsky-bree.de> <20040819113205.GP9601@marowsky-bree.de> <200408201452.52512.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> In-Reply-To: <200408201452.52512.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: drbd-dev-admin@lists.linbit.com Errors-To: drbd-dev-admin@lists.linbit.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Philipp Reisner wrote: [...] > Which policies do we want to offer ? > > * The node that was primary before split brain (current behaviour) > * The node that becaume primary during split brain > * The node that modified more of it's data during the split-brain > situation [ Do not think about implementation yet, just about > the policy ] > * others ?... * The node preferred by the user, if both nodes can be Primary. This makes sense, when the standby node provides not the same performance. * The more stable node - "stable" TBD [To Be Defined] Helmut Wollmersdorfer