From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7MF5irT013397 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:05:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7MF5cV1008187 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:05:44 GMT Message-ID: <4128B637.8040900@tresys.com> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:05:27 -0400 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: russell@coker.com.au CC: SE Linux , fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com, gregkh@gentoo.org Subject: Re: Fedora and udev References: <200408222125.38169.russell@coker.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200408222125.38169.russell@coker.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov I posted a patch here that pebenito did a while back for ramfs and lkcl also did one for tmpfs (which may be better for /dev since it's swappable) both are mostly cut and paste jobs but they add the necessary support. I'd like to reiterate though, that udev support for selinux is *broken*! if the correct policy isn't in place you will cause race conditions Joshua Russell Coker wrote: >It seems that udev is now virtually mandatory as of the latest rawhide update. > >udev uses ramfs for /tmp, ramfs (as of the latest Fedora kernel 2.6.8-1.525) >has no support for file labelling and breaks everything. > >Can we get ramfs labelling working in the next few days or do we have to >change things to not depend on udev? > > > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.