From: Christian Cotte-Barrot <Christian.Cotte-Barrot@bull.net>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH&RFC 2/2] OS_MCA Recovery from poisoned memory read
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:29:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4129AAE0.4726DAC8@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41121484.40804@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>
> Keith Owens wrote:
> > mca_handler_bh() is running as an extension of the MCA event which
> > means that it is not irq safe. It is not safe to get any external lock
> > in mca_page_isolate() or mca_handler_bh().
>
> Therefore the MCA handler couldn't recover the system if the process is
> running in kernel-mode since it possibly has such important kernel locks.
>
> > AFAICT, my concerns about the MCA event and mca_handler_bh() not being
> > irq safe are only a problem for the case when the MCA was triggered by
> > user space code but was delivered when the cpu was in kernel code.
> > Maybe we do not support the problem case.
> >
> > * offending process affected process OS MCA do
> > * kernel mode kernel mode down system
> > * kernel mode user mode kill the process
> > * user mode kernel mode kill the process <== problem
> > * user mode user mode kill the process
>
> So we have to guarantee that the process is running in user-mode,
> which all processes can't have any locks of kernel, right?
>
> It would be happy if this fixed patch satisfy your requirement.
>
Surprising it looks like a discovery (locking problem within the
mca handler) ?
Here is Zoltan's document including a design that exposes a solution
how to avoid race (paragraphs 3.5, 3.5.1, 3.5.2 ...) and many other
stuff :
http://mca-recovery.sourceforge.net
Linux Itanium MCA Recovery Design Document, third draft
http://mca-recovery.sourceforge.net/mca3.html
--
+======+============+=================+
| |\/\/\/| | | |
| | | |Christian Cotte-Barrot |org. :BULL/ |
| | (~)(o) |Bull S.A. |office:FREC/B1-401 |
| C _) |1, rue de Provence |mailto: |
| | ,___| |B.P. 208 | Christian.Cotte-Barrot@bull.net|
| | / |38432 ECHIROLLES CEDEX |phone :+33 (0)476297725 (229 7725)|
| /----\ |FRANCE |fax :+33 (0)476297518 (229 7518)|
+======+============+=================+
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-23 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 11:05 [PATCH&RFC 2/2] OS_MCA Recovery from poisoned memory read Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-05 12:52 ` Keith Owens
2004-08-05 18:49 ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-06 12:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-06 14:32 ` Keith Owens
2004-08-10 7:39 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2004-08-23 8:29 ` Christian Cotte-Barrot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4129AAE0.4726DAC8@bull.net \
--to=christian.cotte-barrot@bull.net \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.