Re: [DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format

[Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> I tried to keep it as short as possible:  here is a page describing the 
> most optimal format for sending patches to Linux kernel developers.
> 
>     http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
> 
> This URL should be permanent, feel free to bookmark it.
> Comments welcome.
> 
>     Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

So, this may already be asked and answered (apologies if it has), but is 
it worth gpg-signing submissions so that authenticity can be verified to 
some degree when a patch is posted (and for archival purposes)? I ask 
because this is whats done on the fedora extras channel when updates get 
pushed, and it seems like a reasonable addition to the process.
Neil

-- 
/***************************************************
  *Neil Horman
  *Software Engineer
  *Red Hat, Inc.
  *nhorman@redhat.com
  *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
  *http://pgp.mit.edu
  ***************************************************/