From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C2JUS-0008NY-UZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:00:45 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C2JUQ-0008MK-Gs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:00:44 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2JUQ-0008Lr-AC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:00:42 -0400
Received: from [216.136.130.117] (helo=smtp209.mail.sc5.yahoo.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2JP8-00035Q-Rw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:55:15 -0400
Message-ID: <41351F31.5070200@yahoo.com.br>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:00:33 -0300
From: "Francisco Figueiredo Jr." <fxjrlists@yahoo.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] getting access violation when installing mdac or
	.net framework on win2k
References: <4134DD46.4040004@yahoo.com.br>
	<41350B95.6080900@yahoo.com.br>	<41350E99.6040804@gmx.com>
	<413514DD.2060501@yahoo.com.br>	<41351438.5070204@gmx.com>
	<1093998409.3290.3.camel@aragorn>
In-Reply-To: <1093998409.3290.3.camel@aragorn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 17:13, Bochnig, Martin wrote:
> 
>>Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I was having another thing in mind...
>>>something like:
>>>
>>>qemu -dontthrowaccessexceptions [options]
>>
>>Would be good in general ;)
>>
> 
> 
> How about qemu -on_error_resume_next
> 
> I'm sorry. Only those condemned to occasionally do Windows development
> will understand...
> 

hahahahahahahahah!
Very nice!

> maybe
> 
> qemu -justdoit
> 
> or more Emu like,
> 
> qemu -headinsand
> 
> -- John.
> 

Those would be very nice too.

Regards,

Francisco Figueiredo Jr.