Re: Re: [PATCH / RFC] nfs-utils: High Availability NFS

[Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>]

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday August 31, paul.clements@steeleye.com wrote:

> I added a bit to the documentation to describe the arguments passed to
> the callout.

Those look good to me.


> Note that for statd, I dropped the third arg being passed.  It seemed
> easier than explaining in the doco why there is a fourth arg.
> Also note that I don't remember what "my_name" is all about.  Could
> you provide a small piece of text to go there.

The my_name argument is the server name, but honestly, I don't know that 
we need anything other than the client name (we really just need to know 
what files to create in the sm/sm.bak directories) so if you want to 
just drop that argument it's fine with me.


> Finally, would you consider having "unmount" instead of "umount" as a
> possible first arg for the mountd callout?

unmount instead of umount is fine if you want to go ahead and make that 
change...

Thanks,
Paul


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs