From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 02:04:58 -0700 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4136E23A.30902@namesys.com> References: <20040826150202.GE5733@mail.shareable.org> <200408282314.i7SNErYv003270@localhost.localdomain> <20040901200806.GC31934@mail.shareable.org> <20040902002431.GN31934@mail.shareable.org> <413694E6.7010606@slaphack.com> <4136A14E.9010303@slaphack.com> <4136C876.5010806@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Masover , Jamie Lokier , Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Linus Torvalds wrote: > >But _my_ point is, no user program is going to take _advantage_ of >anything that only one filesystem on one system offers. > >So there's no point. > >I > Filesystem diversity will only be crippling for Linux if you choose for it to be so.