From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Cc: SELinux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>, Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed Hardware File Context file.
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 15:48:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41377927.3080703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1094153919.17265.375.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 11:52, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
>>Collin and I were discussing a way to label hardware devices correctly.
>>
>>One proposal would be to come up with a new file_contexts file based off
>>of path and hardware type.
>>
>>So we could have a file with
>>
>>/dev/h
>>
>>/u?dev/[shmx]d[^/]* -b system_u:object_r:fixed_disk_device_t
>>/u?dev/[shmx]d[^/]* -b system_u:object_r:removable_disk_device_t cdrom
>>
>>Then either add a param to matchpathcon or a new function that would
>>pass in the hardware type
>>and get the correct context.
>>
>>Then tools like udev could use this to create the device with the
>>correct context.
>>
>>ideas??
>>
>>
>
>This is separate from the main file_contexts configuration used by
>setfiles, restorecon, and rpm? If so, what prevents the device from
>being relabeled back to the wrong type by them? If not, how do they
>determine the hardware type to pass in?
>
>
Yes we talked about that but did not have a good answer. I am not sure
that it would need to be a separate file from the file_contexts file,
if it was the same then the tools would need to be modified to handle
it. IE use the one without the fourth parameter.
The other thought would be to use a separate file that would map device
type to policy
cat hardware_contexts
cdrom system_u:object_r:removable_disk_device_t
disk system_u:object_r:fixed_disk_device_t
...
But this would still fail the restorecon, rpm and setfiles.
One idea would be to not include /dev in the setfiles stuff. ( I guess it wouldn't now that it is a tmpfs file system)
>It also isn't clear that you care about the pathname regex or file type
>if you know that you are dealing with a particular hardware type (and
>unit); you can just map those directly to a context.
>
>
>
We still need a mapping in policy and a libselinux function to give us
that mapping.
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-02 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-24 8:18 policy patch Russell Coker
2004-08-24 12:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-24 16:54 ` Russell Coker
2004-08-27 20:58 ` James Carter
2004-08-28 13:46 ` Russell Coker
2004-08-30 20:24 ` James Carter
2004-09-02 12:46 ` Latest Patches Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 12:54 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 15:23 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 15:46 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 15:53 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 16:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 16:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 19:48 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-02 19:42 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 20:23 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-02 13:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 13:38 ` Russell Coker
2004-09-02 14:46 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 15:52 ` Proposed Hardware File Context file Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 19:38 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 19:48 ` Daniel J Walsh [this message]
2004-09-02 19:59 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 20:08 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 20:09 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 20:15 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 23:30 ` Colin Walters
2004-09-03 11:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-03 13:17 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-03 13:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-03 14:38 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-03 16:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-03 17:03 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-09 16:52 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 22:45 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-02 20:11 ` Please review openssh patch for selinux Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-03 12:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-04 11:21 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-07 19:14 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-06 18:23 ` Nigel Kukard
2004-09-07 16:28 ` Nigel Kukard
2004-09-02 22:59 ` Proposed Hardware File Context file Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-02 19:54 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-02 19:51 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 15:38 ` Latest Patches Daniel J Walsh
2004-09-02 17:15 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-02 18:56 ` James Carter
2004-09-02 13:27 ` Russell Coker
2004-09-02 16:30 ` Joshua Brindle
2004-09-02 16:40 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-09-02 18:00 ` Daniel J Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41377927.3080703@redhat.com \
--to=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=walters@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.