All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 11:53:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41383F33.4050503@fujitsu-siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2y7Hd-1aP-21@gated-at.bofh.it>

William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> @@ -153,15 +119,13 @@
>  void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
>  {
>  	wait_queue_head_t *wqh = bh_waitq_head(bh);
> -	DEFINE_BH_WAIT(wait, bh);
> +	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &bh->b_state, BH_Lock);
>  
> -	do {
> -		prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> -		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
> -			sync_buffer(bh);
> -			io_schedule();
> -		}
> -	} while (buffer_locked(bh));
> +	prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
> +		sync_buffer(bh);
> +		io_schedule();
> +	}
>  	finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wait);
>  }

Why don't you need a do..while loop any more ?

There is also no loop in __wait_on_bit() in the completed patch series.

Cheers
Martin

       reply	other threads:[~2004-09-03  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2xoKb-2Pa-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2y3X5-73V-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2y46A-798-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <2y4T1-7GM-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <2y52E-7Li-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <2y5ci-7Qz-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <2y5m3-7VH-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <2y7Hd-1aP-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-03  9:53               ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2004-09-03  9:42                 ` [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-03  9:55                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-26  8:47 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-08-28  5:26 ` [0/4] standardized waitqueue hashing William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28  5:31   ` [1/4] standardize bit waiting data type William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28  6:17     ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-28  6:34       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28  6:40         ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-28  6:48           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28  9:20             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28  9:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-28  9:20       ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41383F33.4050503@fujitsu-siemens.com \
    --to=martin.wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.