From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl Thompson Subject: Re: CPU Frequency Scaling Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 06:54:23 -0700 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <4138778F.4090207@carlthompson.net> References: <20040901230103.GB4175@ncrfgs3.ncrfgs> <20040902094839.GW29560@poupinou.org> <20040902105348.GA2447@inferi.kami.home> <20040902124151.GZ29560@poupinou.org> <20040903083450.GA8813@ncrfgs3.ncrfgs> <20040903091725.GE29560@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040903091725.GE29560@poupinou.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Bruno Ducrot Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk I've been meaning to release a new version of CPUSpeed (which is of course the best). I'll will definitely have time to do that over the long weekend. Check the CPUSpeed web site often! BTW I just realized that many of you that are using cpufreqd on recent versions of SuSE Linux are actually using my software. It seems the folks at SuSE renamed it. That is unfortunate because there is a different project that uses the cpufreqd name. Thanks, Carl Thompson Bruno Ducrot wrote: >On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:34:50AM +0200, ncrfgs wrote: > > >>BTW which one would you suggest us to use? >> >> >> > >Maybe Carl, Mattia, Jeremy (and probably others) will answer ? :) > >Cheers, > > >