From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i85Gj8322269 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:45:08 -0400 Received: from kidushin.jct.ac.il (kidushin.jct.ac.il [147.161.1.19]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i85GiuS1007426 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:45:07 -0400 Message-ID: <413B427A.5090301@jct.ac.il> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:44:42 +0300 From: Yedidia Klein MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Suggested Kernel and LVM version for production storage References: <413195B2.3050103@jct.ac.il> <20040902175654.GH6264@agk.surrey.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040902175654.GH6264@agk.surrey.redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Alasdair G Kergon wrote: >On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:37:06AM +0300, Yedidia Klein wrote: > > >>Sometimes I'm getting the following errors, and get all my LVM >>FileSystem Blocked .. (mean I can't access the files on these partitions >>and have to reboot for getting access again) >> >> > > > >> Aug 26 01:00:02 nazir kernel: device-mapper: >> Unable to allocate hash table space >> >> > >i.e. There wasn't enough memory available to set up the snapshot. >What sizes: How big is the LV & snapshot? > main partition is 500GB and I've two snapshots, weekly that is 100G and daily that is 60G > >What chunk size? [Try changing.] > > chunk is 8.00 KB (what is the suggested value ??) >Is there just one snapshot? > > as I wrote there are two.. >Check your memory usage. > > my hardware memory is almost full 860/1000, but the swap isn't that used (it's now 3.3/2000) do the device mapper need more real mem ?? does it worth to increase the swap ? tnx, --Yedidia >Alasdair > >