From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joy Subject: Re: Monolithic kernel again Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:27:34 +0530 Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4142E82E.2030303@sancharnet.in> References: <20040910131336.4ff36228@matth.ilan.cogent.net> <20040910135350.65bcd356@matth.ilan.cogent.net> Reply-To: gracecott@sancharnet.in Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii" To: Tony Gogoi Cc: terry white , linux-admin Tony Gogoi wrote: >Hello, > >I tried what u guys suggested. > >Instead of using "make install" script to do all the new kernel >installation, I copied ~mydir/arc/i386/boot/bzimage /boot/vmlinuz, copied >~mydir/System.map to /boot (or made a soft link to /boot/System.map). > >When I boot however, it goes upto "initalizing swap space [OK] and then >then says: Can't open dependencies file /lib/modules/mykernel-version..... > > > why don't you just do a make modules_install ? maybe it just needs the presence of such a file regardless of wether your kernel is modular or not.... atleast, if nothing else , to ensure that there are no module dependencies..... >But why does a monolithic kernel try to "open" a "modules" related file? I >guess I need to play around with the /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit and remove the >lines related to "probing"... I did try a bit of that too earlier but only >made things worse. > >I never had these problems with compiling modular kernels. > >regards, > > Joy.M.Monteiro >tony > > > >