All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: BSG question
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:36:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4148FC12.1010205@torque.net> (raw)

In the "[PATCH] New QStor SATA/RAID Driver for 2.6.9-rc2"
thread Jeff Garzik wrote:

 > * if the userland interface is 100% sending cdbs or taskfiles, then I
 > would prefer that Jens Axboe's "bsg" be used.  Its a chardev interface
 > for sending/receiving commands to a request queue.

I played around with bsg
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=109160967927030&w=2
about a month ago and it
looked good (and I would like sg to evolve in that
direction as well). My plan was to make a version of sg_dd
from sg3_utils use it. However since it was a patch it is hard
to keep in sync as kernel versions roll-out.

Any chance of getting it into the main line kernel,
on the quiet? Failing that, a web site with up to date
patches.

Various comments were made at the time
of its release that a more 64/32 bit friendly version
of struct sg_io_hdr was needed (this is for folks running
32 bits apps on a 64 bit architectures). As I pointed
out struct sg_io_hdr was written with alternate interfaces
in mind (i.e. its first field: 'int interface_id').

bsg has one device node (i.e. "/dev/bsg") which users can
open and then bind/attach to an existing block device
node (e.g. /dev/sda). Extending this to bind to sysfs
device paths might be handy as well for
    - (SCSI) devices that have an unsupported peripheral device
       type (e.g. SES)
    - other devices (e.g. SMP port of an SAS expander)


Doug Gilbert

             reply	other threads:[~2004-09-16  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-16  2:36 Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2004-09-16  6:05 ` BSG question Jens Axboe
2004-09-16  7:14   ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-09-16  7:24     ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-16 15:11     ` Peter Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4148FC12.1010205@torque.net \
    --to=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.