From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Benchmark : ext3 vs reiser4 and effects of fragmentation. Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:29:27 -0700 Message-ID: <414A4C07.8060802@namesys.com> References: <4148BC0E.5010509@willsmith.org> <20040916085248.GI5137@backtop.namesys.com> <20040916130809.GI26192@nysv.org> <20040916153835.GK5137@backtop.namesys.com> <20040916155248.GM26192@nysv.org> <20040916183831.GL5137@backtop.namesys.com> <20040916190019.GN26192@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20040916190019.GN26192@nysv.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_T=F6rnqvist?= Cc: Alex Zarochentsev , Will Smith , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote: >On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:38:31PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: > =20 > >>on-line defragmenter requires its part to be in kernel space. at least no= de >>locks cannot be exported _safely_ to the user space, I think. >> =20 >> > >What if it was like=20 >echo -n "Killer Algo by Zam" > /sys/fs/reiser4/hda1/repacker/algorithm >or something to get rid of the risk of having two really separate >mechanisms, and if it can't be in userspace either way... > >This is also probably related to what Nik said back in the days about >an online-fsck being impossible :) > > =20 > Online fsck is possible. Will do it for SuSE for 200k.;-) It is a very serious task. I would not do it just for fun. It is,=20 however, feasible. Hans