From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Kiran Kumar <immidi_kiran@yahoo.com>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: [PATCH]: Fix invalid return values from sctp_new
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:28:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <414E9493.3020800@trash.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 468 bytes --]
Hi Kiran,
there are multiple places in sctp_new where it returns -1, but
it looks like it really wants to return "invalid". The call to
protocol->new in init_conntrack looks like this:
if (!protocol->new(conntrack, skb)) {
kmem_cache_free(ip_conntrack_cachep, conntrack);
return NULL;
}
so it has to return 0 to say "invalid". Please check if the
attached patch which fixes these places is correct.
Regards
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1646 bytes --]
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2004/09/20 10:06:40+02:00 kaber@coreworks.de
# [NETFILTER]: Fix invalid return values from sctp_new
#
# Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
#
# net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
# 2004/09/20 10:06:16+02:00 kaber@coreworks.de +5 -5
# [NETFILTER]: Fix invalid return values from sctp_new
#
# Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
#
diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c 2004-09-20 10:26:10 +02:00
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c 2004-09-20 10:26:10 +02:00
@@ -430,16 +430,16 @@
DEBUGP("\n");
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, skb->nh.iph->ihl * 4, &sctph, sizeof(sctph)) != 0)
- return -1;
+ return 0;
if (do_basic_checks(conntrack, skb, map) != 0)
- return -1;
+ return 0;
/* If an OOTB packet has any of these chunks discard (Sec 8.4) */
if ((test_bit (SCTP_CID_ABORT, (void *)map))
|| (test_bit (SCTP_CID_SHUTDOWN_COMPLETE, (void *)map))
|| (test_bit (SCTP_CID_COOKIE_ACK, (void *)map))) {
- return -1;
+ return 0;
}
newconntrack = SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX;
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset + sizeof (sctp_chunkhdr_t),
&inithdr, sizeof(inithdr)) != 0) {
- return -1;
+ return 0;
}
DEBUGP("Setting vtag %x for new conn\n",
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@
inithdr.init_tag;
} else {
/* Sec 8.5.1 (A) */
- return -1;
+ return 0;
}
}
/* If it is a shutdown ack OOTB packet, we expect a return
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 8:28 Patrick McHardy [this message]
2004-09-20 8:39 ` [PATCH]: Fix invalid return values from sctp_new Kiran Kumar Immidi
2004-09-20 9:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-09-20 9:26 ` Kiran Kumar Immidi
2004-09-20 9:40 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=414E9493.3020800@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=immidi_kiran@yahoo.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.