From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: Mobile Celeron with Speedstep ? - speedstep-centrino freezesmachine Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:44:37 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <415084A5.7060104@renninger.de> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6002EDBFA5@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6002EDBFA5@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: Dominik Brodowski , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > This may be due to C-states and probably unrelated to frequency changes. > Check out - http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3219 > > Modprobe of cpufreq driver is probably adding acpi/processor.ko. Yes, thanks. Patch (disabling C2) works: *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000] usage[00183115] C2: C3: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[250] usage[00000000] > > Thanks, > Venki > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk >>[mailto:cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk] On Behalf Of Dominik >>Brodowski >>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:34 AM >>To: Thomas Renninger >>Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk >>Subject: Re: Mobile Celeron with Speedstep ? - >>speedstep-centrino freezesmachine >> >>On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:55:21PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: >> >>>modprobe cpufreq_acpi_pdump >>>FATAL: Error inserting cpufreq_acpi_pdump >>> >> >>(/lib/modules/2.6.8-7-default/kernel/drivers/acpi/cpufreq-acpi_ >>pdump.ko): >> >>>Input/output error >>>ibm9:/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq # >>> >>>-> Freeze. >>>Anyone an idea what exactly could cause the freeze, or how >> >>to analyse it? >> >>Do I understand it correctly that the system freezes _after_ modprobing >>cpufreq_acpi_pdump fails??? The -EIO result itself isn't >>strange, it means >>the call to acpi_processor_register_performance() failed which >>happens on >>several systems. I made cpufreq_acpi_pdump depending on processor module by mistake :'( , sorry. Thomas