Re: [patch] types.fc

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>]

James Carter wrote:

>Also, I don't see anything that matches /usr/.*redhat-linux/lib(64)? on
>FC2 or FC3 test2 (or RH8 for that matter).  What version of Fedora or
>Red Hat Linux are they for?  Are they for something that maybe I don't
>have installed?  Or are they now obsolete and can be removed?  
>Dan or Russell, do you know?
>  
>
I don't know what they are so I would remove them.

>Index: file_contexts/types.fc
>  
>
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file:
>>/cvsroot/selinux/nsa/selinux-usr/policy/file_contexts/types.fc,v
>>retrieving revision 1.40
>>diff -u -r1.40 types.fc
>>--- file_contexts/types.fc      23 Sep 2004 19:08:59 -0000      1.40
>>+++ file_contexts/types.fc      24 Sep 2004 01:00:59 -0000
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>
>>@@ -352,11 +362,14 @@
>> /usr/.*glibc.*-linux/lib(64)?/ld[^/]*\.so(\.[^/]*)*    --      system_u:object_r:ld_so_t
>> /usr/.*glibc.*-linux/lib(64)?/lib[^/]*\.so(\.[^/]*)*   --      system_u:object_r:shlib_t
>> 
>>+#
>> # /usr/.*redhat-linux/lib(64)?
>> #
>>+ifdef(`distro_redhat', `
>> /usr/.*redhat-linux/lib(64)?(/.*)?     system_u:object_r:lib_t
>> /usr/.*redhat-linux/lib(64)?/ld[^/]*\.so(\.[^/]*)*     --      system_u:object_r:ld_so_t
>> /usr/.*redhat-linux/lib(64)?/lib[^/]*\.so(\.[^/]*)*    --      system_u:object_r:shlib_t
>>+')
>> 
>> #
>># /usr/.*linux-libc.*/lib(64)?
>>    
>>
>
>On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 21:02, Chris PeBenito wrote:
>  
>
>>Here's an update of types.fc with a some Gentoo-specific entries,
>>against CVS.  Also enclose a few entries with other distro tunables.
>>    
>>


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.