From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Lodal Subject: Re: RFC: Partial IP4 syntax Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:41:45 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <415B3A29.7040000@parknet.dk> References: <415A12AE.1060901@parknet.dk> <415A3263.7080708@xgendev.com> <415A4B4E.1080801@parknet.dk> <415AE4F4.2000903@parknet.dk> <415B02CD.2080403@parknet.dk> <1096485092.5733.6.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Cedric Blancher In-Reply-To: <1096485092.5733.6.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Cedric Blancher skrev: >>Because iptables -nvL lines are already horribly long. Anything making >>them shorter is good for readability. > > If having them more readable means have them confusing, I prefer keep > reading long lines. The whole point is to make things easier to write and to read. People also had to get used to cidr masks, habits play a role. As does interest in improvements. Simon