From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.33) id 1CDPZI-0003k6-6V for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:43:36 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CDPZG-0003ir-Ik for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:43:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CDPZG-0003iL-3Y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:43:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CDPZF-0003iE-Vu for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:43:34 -0400 Received: from [157.24.2.30] (helo=smtp1.cc.lut.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDPSm-000109-Fw for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:36:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.cc.lut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381FF70112 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:35:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from smtp1.cc.lut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.cc.lut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05668-07 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:35:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [157.24.102.107] (lk4-a-4-1.lnet.lut.fi [157.24.102.107]) by smtp1.cc.lut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8337E70101 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:35:31 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <415D7992.1010507@nic.fi> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:36:50 +0300 From: chaac User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20040928190544.GA24852@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200409301533.28151.okuji@enbug.org> <871xgjg5ll.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> <200410011709.03394.okuji@enbug.org> In-Reply-To: <200410011709.03394.okuji@enbug.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by lut.fi Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Automagic command loading X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:43:34 -0000 Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > I don't see any serious disadvantage in autocmd.lst. Generating this=20 > file is as easy as embedding command names in modules. Editing this=20 > file is not difficult at all for users who can write their own modules. One advantage for autocmd.lst is that you can probably specify where to=20 load module. Let's assume you are coding some module and want to store=20 that module on network or another drive/path. Then you could just=20 specify location to there. Thanks, Vesa J=E4=E4skel=E4inen