From: Dataforce <Dataforce@Home.dataforce.org.uk>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Possible Simple Configuration gone wrong
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 23:12:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41607945.8040802@Home.dataforce.org.uk> (raw)
I was just wondering, how would i go about setting up iptables rules as
follows:
Here is my network setup
the iptables machine has the ip 82.133.x.x on eth1, and 192.168.0.5 on eth0
(82.133.x.x) [Internet]----[iptables]----[Machine 1] (192.168.0.6)
|--------[Machine 2] (192.168.0.2)
`--------[Other Machines]
I setup a port forward as follows:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dst 82.133.x.x --dport
3389 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.6:3389
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 3389 -j DNAT --to
192.168.0.6:3389
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING --dst 192.168.0.6 -p tcp --dport 3389 -j
SNAT --to-source 82.133.x.x
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j MASQUERADE
now, this allows machine2 AND internet clients to connect to port 3389
on 82.133.x.x and get to machine1
however, according to machine1, all clients appear to have come from
192.168.0.5
I would like it setup so that lan clients appear to come from
192.168.0.5 (so that packets get routed correctly
[machine1]--[iptables]--[machine2] not [machine1]--[machine2]) where as
packets from the internet appear to come from the correct ip.
i have tried replacing
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j MASQUERADE
with
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/16 -j SNAT --to-source
82.133.x.x
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s ! 192.168.0.0/16 -j MASQUERADE
(suggested by a friend)
and vice versa (swapping the !) however it either prevents external
connections compeltey or gives the same effect as before.
is what i would like possible with iptables? or will i jsut have to live
with all clients appearing as 192.168.0.5
thanks
-DF
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-03 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-03 22:12 Dataforce [this message]
2004-10-04 14:27 ` Possible Simple Configuration gone wrong Nick Taylor
2004-10-04 15:21 ` Dataforce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41607945.8040802@Home.dataforce.org.uk \
--to=dataforce@home.dataforce.org.uk \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.