From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:04:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4160932.uvjJSNcuKL@amdc1227> References: <1386864441-19561-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <20140108171544.GC14575@lee--X1> <20140108175939.27803.30462@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:23582 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbaAHSFF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:05:05 -0500 In-reply-to: <20140108175939.27803.30462@quantum> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: Lee Jones , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Sachin Kamat , Kyungmin Park On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 09:59:39 Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44) > > > I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid such > > > confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any clock > > > series as pull requests. > > > > Me? I haven't applied any clk patches. > > I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now. Thanks. > I can take patch #8 as > well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc? Hmm, patch 8 is trivial enough to not cause any merge conflicts, but since it's unlikely that any users depending on introduced changes will show up for 3.14 it shouldn't really matter which tree it goes through... Best regards, Tomasz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:04:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: max77686: Clock provider implementation fixes In-Reply-To: <20140108175939.27803.30462@quantum> References: <1386864441-19561-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <20140108171544.GC14575@lee--X1> <20140108175939.27803.30462@quantum> Message-ID: <4160932.uvjJSNcuKL@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 08 of January 2014 09:59:39 Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2014-01-08 09:15:44) > > > I believe Lee has already applied this one, but in future, to avoid such > > > confusion, if it's more convenient for you, I can send you any clock > > > series as pull requests. > > > > Me? I haven't applied any clk patches. > > I have taken patches 1-7 into clk-next just now. Thanks. > I can take patch #8 as > well but it would probably be better to send it through arm-soc? Hmm, patch 8 is trivial enough to not cause any merge conflicts, but since it's unlikely that any users depending on introduced changes will show up for 3.14 it shouldn't really matter which tree it goes through... Best regards, Tomasz