From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Core scsi layer crashes in 2.6.8.1 Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:57:40 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4162C474.8010505@rtr.ca> References: <1096401785.13936.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4162B345.9000806@rtr.ca> <1096988167.2064.7.camel@mulgrave> <200410051749.22245.oliver@neukum.org> <1096991666.2064.25.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1096991666.2064.25.camel@mulgrave> To: James Bottomley Cc: Oliver Neukum , Anton Blanchard , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , SCSI Mailing List List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley wrote: > > It would add quite a bit of complexity to the reference counted > aynchronous model to try and force synchronicity between queuecommand > and scsi_remove_host in the mid-layer. Therefore it's much easier to > let the LLD decide what to do with the command. Presumably the same is also true for scsi_remove_device() ? Cheers -- Mark Lord (hdparm keeper & the original "Linux IDE Guy")