All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk (Agustín Benito Bethencourt)
To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
Subject: [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:44:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4164408.1bE63kujAu@linux-if6s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000501d3ec18$26ef17d0$74cd4770$@toshiba.co.jp>

Hi Daniel,

On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 08:44:19 CEST Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> It seems that backporting "fanotify: Release SRCU lock when waiting for
> userspace response" was too complicated:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2017/06/msg00170.html
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org
> > [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > Sangorrin Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 1:07 PM
> > To: 'Ben Hutchings' <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>;
> > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org
> > > [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > > Sangorrin Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 8:53 AM
> > > To: 'Ben Hutchings' <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>;
> > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
> > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > I saw there is already a 4.4.129 on the linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y.
> > > Test results so far show no regressions (altough i see failures that
> > > might need investigation?):
> > > Pixel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/22/732
> > > Linaro: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/116
> > > Kerneltests: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/823
> > > dmseg: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/1028
> > > 
> > > I will run some tests with Fuego.
> > 
> > Sorry for the late response. I tested LTS 4.4.129 with Fuego and most
> > tests worked correctly.
> > There were a few errors on some of the LTP tests (see the file attached).
> > 
> > fcntl35.c:98: FAIL: an unprivileged user init the capacity of a pipe to
> > 65536 unexpectedly, expected 4096
> > getxattr04.c:72: FAIL: getxattr() failed to get an existing attribute
> > inotify07.c:157: FAIL: didn't get event: mask=40000004
> > inotify08.c:150: FAIL: didn't get event: mask=4
> > [Note] These 4 errors could be related with some configuration, so I need
> > to investigate them further.
> > 
> > For fanotify07 and fanotify08 I got some timeout errors:
> > tst_test.c:1015: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > Cannot kill test processes!
> > Congratulation, likely test hit a kernel bug.
> > Exitting uncleanly...
> > 
> > Dhinakar Kalyanasundaram mentioned that this bug was fixed in kernel 4.14,
> > and Tim Bird updated the Fuego LTP documentation suggesting that
> > backporting the patch "fanotify: Release SRCU lock when waiting for
> > userspace response" should fix the hang.
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9659809/
> > 
> > Shall I backport it and test?

It would be of a great help.

Can you send these reports to cip-testing-results ?

Best Regards


-- 
Agust?n Benito Bethencourt
Principal Consultant
Codethink Ltd

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25 13:18 [cip-dev] Reviewing 4.4 stable updates Ben Hutchings
2018-04-25 23:52 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-04-26 14:30   ` Ben Hutchings
2018-05-15  4:06   ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-05-15  6:44     ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-05-15  7:44       ` Agustín Benito Bethencourt [this message]
2018-05-15  7:53         ` Daniel Wagner
2018-05-17  1:44           ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-05-17  5:35             ` Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4164408.1bE63kujAu@linux-if6s \
    --to=agustin.benito@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.