From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb classfor
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 14:29:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <416552C7.5020802@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041006073827.5C1826CB7C7@mail.caucasus.net>
mjoachimiak@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
>
>>mjoachimiak@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
>>
>>>Your gues is right. To get HTB work correctly you must know rate
>
> parameter
>
>>>for your connection also known as CIR.
>>>Coud you tell what minimum rate your clients have?
>>
>>My worst HTB class has rate&ceil 778bps.
>>
>>I guess the lower the rate, the less accurate the result. It can't be
>>accurate, because the class already exceeds it's limit by sending just
>>one single packet.
>
> I agree. As far as I know average MTU is 1500bytes. I have rate
> 13kbit/8\x1625bytes so the limit should not be reached. Maybe there is
> overhead on ppp link and with this overhead clients gets congested?
> What do you think?
> Any ideas?
Low rates seem OK for me. I don't think relating packet size to rate in
kbit/sec is the right way to think about things.
A class with a low rate will send a packet and then not be able to send
again for an amount of time which is (pre)calculated from packet size
and rate. The time may be > 1 second, so things work out in the end.
Andy.
>
>>Maybe it's more accurate in the long run, but I don't have any
>>statistics to prove that. Anyway, the traffic for that class is damn
>>slow, and that's all I need to know. ;-)
>>
>>Andreas
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 7:39 [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class for accurate operation? Zviad O. Giorgadze
2004-10-06 8:14 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class Andreas Klauer
2004-10-06 8:47 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class for accurate operation? mjoachimiak
2004-10-06 10:00 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb classfor Andreas Klauer
2004-10-06 10:54 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb classfor accurate operation? mjoachimiak
2004-10-06 11:01 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb classfor Andreas Klauer
2004-10-06 14:09 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class for gypsy
2004-10-06 19:05 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class for accurate operation? Stef Coene
2004-10-07 6:54 ` Re: [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class foraccurate operation? Zviad O. Giorgadze
2004-10-07 7:03 ` Re: [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb class for accurate operation? Zviad O. Giorgadze
2004-10-07 7:53 ` [LARTC] What is the reccomended minimum rate for leaf htb classfor " mjoachimiak
2004-10-07 14:29 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=416552C7.5020802@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.