From: Primero <primero@fastwebnet.it>
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] UML Guests and CPU Performance.
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:11:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <417101F4.1050109@fastwebnet.it> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1417 bytes --]
Hi ML, it is a little bit of time i've started using UML and i'm still
"playing" with it. Anyway there's a thing that let me confused.
It seems to me that performance of UML Guest machine is sensibly worst
then UML Host ... even if there is only one UML guest and no other
processes sucking resources.
My Setup is:
Athlon 1000
512 RAM
1 GB tmpfs /tmp
30GB 4200 eide
The guest is started with 256MB of RAM
I can post /proc/cpuinfo:
Host:
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
cpu MHz : 1000.502
cache size : 64 KB
bogomips : 1970.17
Guest:
processor : 0
vendor_id : User Mode Linux
model name : UML
mode : skas
host : Linux Pancho 2.6.8.1-cko8 #2 Mon Oct 11 17:03:08 CEST
2004 i686
bogomips : 1081.34
Here are results of Kernel Time compiling with the same .config:
Host:
real 15m27.226s
user 13m49.185s
sys 1m12.144s
Guest:
real 29m27.603s
user 21m16.970s
sys 7m59.080s
The Bogomips of the Guest are the half of the Host and compiling time is
almost the double.
I want to know if this is "Normal" or i have to look for some errors in
my configuration.
Thx
Primero
--
---------------------------------------
#######################################
"Linux, the choice of a GNU generation"
==Micro$oft - just say NO==
#######################################
---------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-16 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-16 11:11 Primero [this message]
2004-11-03 12:56 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] UML Guests and CPU Performance Nuutti Kotivuori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=417101F4.1050109@fastwebnet.it \
--to=primero@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.