From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: libipq: man page != online doc and a question Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:29:04 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <41714C50.8060400@eurodev.net> References: <20041015192145.383e8bd9.tigrezno@log01.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Jvalencia In-Reply-To: <20041015192145.383e8bd9.tigrezno@log01.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Jvalencia wrote: >I've been looking at ipq_set_verdict man page, finding two verdicts: NF_ACCEPT and NF_DROP. > > correct >This man page dates from 2001 :S > >Online netfilter hacking guide tells about NF_ACCEPT, NF_DROP, NF_QUEUE and NF_REPEAT. > > yes, these are all possibles verdicts in a *kernel hook*, not in ip_queue >Can I send the packet to another chain with verdicts? > > what do you mean? regards, Pablo