From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Rokos <michal@rokos.info>
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack_core: port to module_param
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:41:00 +0200
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <4172E6EC.9030106@rokos.info>
References: <200410160010.40500.michal@rokos.info>
	<200410172131.i9HLVrVF010252@toshiba.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <200410172131.i9HLVrVF010252@toshiba.co.jp>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Hello,

Yasuyuki Kozakai wrote:
> As I said at usagi-users ML, I have already started synchronizing nf_conntrack
> with ip_conntrack in linux 2.9.6-rc4, and already done same changes in your
> patch.

I'm very pleased to see it's happening.

> By the way, I reviewed your patches sent to usagi-users ML.
> 	- 3 patches to introduce seq_file API.
> 	- a patch to introduce module_param to ftp module.
> 
> They were almost fine for me, and applied them. Thank you!

No - I thank you!

> Then could you send your Signed-off-by ?

Signed-off-by: Michal Rokos <michal@rokos.info>

(and I'll append this in all latter patches)

> And, I'm changing many parts and afraid of double work. After more some
> changes and tests, I'll send the latest nf_conntrack (or commit it to tree
> in netfilter site). I use the branch for nf_conntrack in USAGI tree as
> snapshot only. Moreover, I think that almost people check nf_conntrack
> in only netfilter site.
> 
> So, could you wait for a while to prevent double work and use nf_conntrack
> in netfilter site if you want to make patches ?

Of course! I'd hate that (double work) too.

I'll be checking out netfilter repository only.

Michal

> 
> Regards,
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ USAGI Project <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
> 
> 
> From: Michal Rokos <michal@rokos.info>
> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:10:40 +0200
> 
> 
>>Hello,
>>
>>as Yasuyuki KOZAKAI directed, I'm sending nf_conntrack patches here 
>>instead of usagi-users.
>>
>>This one is 1 addition I forget to fold into last patch I sent.
>>
>>Make nf_conntrack_core use module_param() and turn of debugging by 
>>default.
>>
>>Michal
>>
>># This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
>>#
>># ChangeSet
>>#   2004/10/15 23:52:28+02:00 michal@michal.rokos.info 
>>#   Forgot to port nf_conntrack_core to module_param too.
>># 
>># net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>>#   2004/10/15 23:52:17+02:00 michal@michal.rokos.info +2 -2
>>#   Port nf_conntrack_core to module_param too.
>># 
>>diff -Nru a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 
>>b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
>>--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2004-10-16 00:07:30 +02:00
>>+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2004-10-16 00:07:30 +02:00
>>@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
>> 
>> #define NF_CONNTRACK_VERSION "0.3"
>> 
>>-#if 1
>>+#if 0
>> #define DEBUGP printk
>> #else
>> #define DEBUGP(format, args...)
>>@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@
>> }
>> 
>> static int hashsize;
>>-MODULE_PARM(hashsize, "i");
>>+module_param(hashsize, int, 0400);
>> 
>> int __init nf_conntrack_init(void)
>> {
>>
>>