From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nebojsa Trpkovic <trx@inbox.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_ondemand
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:45:57 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <4172F625.9080709@inbox.ru>
References: <20041017222916.GA30841@inskipp.digriz.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20041017222916.GA30841@inskipp.digriz.org.uk>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

Alexander Clouter wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>After playing with the cpufreq_ondemand governor (many thanks to those whom 
>made it) I made a number of alterations which suit me at least.  Really 
>looking for feedback and of course once people have fixed any bugs they find 
>and made the code look neater, possible inclusion?
>
I'm newby here:
Will this replace cpudyn, powernowd and other userspace company?