From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <panto@intracom.gr>
Received: from mailserv.intranet.gr (mailserv.intranet.GR [146.124.14.106])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2C2BC0F
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:16:57 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mailserv.intranet.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailserv.intranet.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9PBHr8d013619
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:17:54 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <417CDF67.7010201@intracom.gr>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:11:35 +0300
From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
References: <20041023142750.GA11545@logos.cnet> <417C9D25.8060609@intracom.gr>
	<Pine.LNX.4.60.0410250532300.27260@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410250532300.27260@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Cc: linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: m8xx_pcmcia.c for v2.6 kernels
List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List
	<linuxppc-embedded.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi fellows,
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm attaching a port of our internal m8xx_pcmcia.c (based on MontaVista
>>>2.1's 2.4.17 kernel with many fixes) to v2.6.
>>>      
>>>
>
>... huge SNIP here ...
>
>  
>
>>Marcelo Hi
>>
>>I'm gonna definately try this and get back to you.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Pantelis
>>    
>>
>
>was it absolutely necessary to include 46K worth of patch in your
>reply, only to add what you did at the bottom?
>
>rday
>
>
>  
>
OK, OK

No it was not, it was early in the morning and didn't really see the
size of the patch. When I hit the post button it was too late.

Apologies.

Regards

Pantelis