From: R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: hbathini@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
venkat88@linux.ibm.com, yeswanth@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 22:02:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418fbfa0-9e0a-4bf9-927d-cfd5b08aa087@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0700c866205c8fa2f861e4b8d64fdf7469cba021.1788154635.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
On 31.08.2026 12:46 PM, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Ensure the dummy trampoline address field present between the OOL stub
> and the long branch stub is 4/8-byte aligned, for memory compatibility
> when content loaded to a register.
>
> Reported-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: d243b62b7bd3 ("powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf trampolines")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
System: ppc64le LPAR (IBM POWER), Linux 7.3-rc2
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 7 +++---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 7 +++---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 7 +++---
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 6d58df361648..4da8bde92e1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -227,10 +227,11 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *
> int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx,
> u32 *addrs, int pass, bool extra_pass);
> void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> -void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> -void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> +void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> +void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> void bpf_jit_realloc_regs(struct codegen_context *ctx);
> -int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr);
> +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
> + long exit_addr);
> void prepare_for_fsession_fentry(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int cookie_cnt,
> int cookie_off, int retval_off);
> void store_func_meta(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func_meta, int func_meta_off);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 11981d2270a9..8ca36a933c7a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -49,11 +49,35 @@ asm (
> " .popsection ;"
> );
>
> -void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> +void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> int ool_stub_idx, long_branch_stub_idx;
> + int ool_stub_sz;
>
> /*
> + * Align the mis-aligned dummy_tramp_addr field in the fimage.
> + * The alignment NOP must appear before OOL stub, to make
> + * ool_stub_idx & long_branch_stub_idx constant from end.
> + *
> + * The fimage can be non 8-byte aligned, so final alignment depends
> + * on start of fimage and the stub's instruction count offset. The
> + * OOL stub size is 4 instructions (with CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE)
> + * or 3 instructions (without) before dummy_tramp_addr.
> + *
> + * Emit a NOP here if address is not SZL aligned.
> + *
> + * In pass=0 when image==NULL, conservatively account for space
> + * required to accommodate alignment NOP. In case final pass skips
> + * emitting alignment NOP, the image buffer have 4 spare bytes and
> + * jited_len signifies correct program size.
> + */
> +
> + ool_stub_sz = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE) ? 16 : 12;
> + if (!image || !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)fimage + ctx->idx*4 + ool_stub_sz, SZL))
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
> +
> + /*
> + * nop // optional, for alignment of dummy_tramp_addr
> * Out-of-line stub:
> * mflr r0
> * [b|bl] tramp
> @@ -70,7 +94,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>
> /*
> * Long branch stub:
> - * .long <dummy_tramp_addr>
> + * .long <dummy_tramp_addr> // 8-byte aligned
> * mflr r11
> * bcl 20,31,$+4
> * mflr r12
> @@ -81,6 +105,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> */
> if (image)
> *((unsigned long *)&image[ctx->idx]) = (unsigned long)dummy_tramp;
> +
> ctx->idx += SZL / 4;
> long_branch_stub_idx = ctx->idx;
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R11));
> @@ -97,7 +122,8 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> }
> }
>
> -int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr)
> +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx,
> + int tmp_reg, long exit_addr)
> {
> if (exit_addr && is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (long)(ctx->idx * 4))) {
> PPC_JMP(exit_addr);
> @@ -106,7 +132,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
> PPC_JMP(ctx->alt_exit_addr);
> } else {
> ctx->alt_exit_addr = ctx->idx * 4;
> - bpf_jit_build_epilogue(image, ctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(image, fimage, ctx);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -286,7 +312,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr
> */
> bpf_jit_build_prologue(NULL, &cgctx);
> addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4;
> - bpf_jit_build_epilogue(NULL, &cgctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(NULL, NULL, &cgctx);
>
> fixup_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4;
> extable_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * sizeof(struct exception_table_entry);
> @@ -322,7 +348,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr
> goto out_err;
> }
> addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4;
> - bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, &cgctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, fcode_base, &cgctx);
>
> proglen = cgctx.idx * 4;
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index bfdc50740da8..f5b9441cf46a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
>
> }
>
> -void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> +void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0)));
>
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR());
>
> - bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, ctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, fimage, ctx);
> }
>
> /* Relative offset needs to be calculated based on final image location */
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> * we'll just fall through to the epilogue.
> */
> if (i != flen - 1) {
> - ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, _R0, exit_addr);
> + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, fimage,
> + ctx, _R0, exit_addr);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 59302cabc466..e80312171aa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
> }
> }
>
> -void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> +void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx);
>
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR());
>
> - bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, ctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, fimage, ctx);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1737,7 +1737,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> * we'll just fall through to the epilogue.
> */
> if (i != flen - 1) {
> - ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, tmp1_reg, exit_addr);
> + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, fimage, ctx,
> + tmp1_reg, exit_addr);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
--
Thanks and Regards
R.Nageswara Sastry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 7:15 [PATCH v13 0/8] powerpc/bpf: address missing verifier selftest coverage Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 7:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:30 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:15 ` [PATCH v13 2/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix percpu private stack leak on JIT failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 7:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 16:31 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 3/8] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 8:48 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:31 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 4/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 8:23 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 8:35 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:32 ` R Nageswara Sastry [this message]
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 5/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 7:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 8:46 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:32 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix powerpc JIT disassembly failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 7/8] selftests/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tailcall " Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418fbfa0-9e0a-4bf9-927d-cfd5b08aa087@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yeswanth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.