From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hopwood Subject: Re: Xen and Linux Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 03:44:39 +0000 Message-ID: <41903D27.8050403@blueyonder.co.uk> References: Reply-To: david.nospam.hopwood@blueyonder.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Ian Pratt wrote: > >>>possible to have a common kernel binary that would work with/without >>>Xen. In other words, to dynamically determine if it's running >>>under Xen, and behave appropriately. >> >>This has been dubbed "transparent virtualization". > > note that IBM did it with CMS under VM, see Melinda Varian's excellent > article on all this. -- David Hopwood ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click