From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: disk throttling Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:30:17 +0100 Message-ID: <4194BAE9.3030405@melon.dk> References: <4193A0DF.50208@mcs.anl.gov> <200411111909.33405.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200411111909.33405.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Mark A. Williamson wrote: > There are plans for some improved disk QoS (I think it's on the roadmap). The > current mode of disk scheduling doesn't differentiate different service > qualities. I don't *think* it does accounting yet (this'd likely be added at > the same time). > > Unlike for network, there wasn't a standard Linux way to do this. Maybe the > pluggable Linux IO schedulers framework (possible merge in 2.6.10) would help > with this work. > Has the plan of turning Xen into a next-gen BIOS been scrapped? It seems Xen is becoming more and more dependent on having a specific version of Linux as dom0? Jacob ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click