From: Peri Hankey <mpah@thegreen.co.uk>
To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: copy on write memory
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:01:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41992736.8040504@thegreen.co.uk> (raw)
Hello
UML has developed a SKAS mode of operation, in which (as far as I
understand it) a process can be created much in the same way as any
other Linux process, except that it runs (under an UML kernel) with a
separate kernel address space.
It occurred to me that the equivalent in the Xen world would be to use
one Linux xenU domain purely as a page-table manager for a collection of
separate xenU domains that are expected or known have similar process
populations. The process creation domain would have a large allocation
of memory which it would use to populate page tables applying standard
copy on write semantics, but the processes to which these page tables
belong would effectively run in the separate execution domains to which
they belong.
A similar arrangement of one page-table management domain with multiple
separate execution domains could be used for other kernels such as
netbsd, which have similar copy on write semantics.
Xen itself would only need to provide a mechanism for managing the trade
between a page-manager domain and its execution domains, and would not
need to replicate the functionality of any particular system.
As the page-table manager domain also knows which disk pages are clean,
and which have been written to, it is also in a good position to manage
copy on write semantics for filesystem storage.
Is this a feasible way of looking at it?
Regards
Peri Hankey
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-15 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-15 22:01 Peri Hankey [this message]
2004-11-16 0:35 ` copy on write memory Rik van Riel
2004-11-16 9:44 ` Peri Hankey
2004-11-16 9:51 ` Peri Hankey
2004-11-16 15:27 ` urmk
2004-11-16 16:17 ` Mark A. Williamson
2004-11-18 16:56 ` Peri Hankey
2004-11-18 17:11 ` urmk
2004-11-18 17:25 ` Keir Fraser
2004-11-18 18:41 ` Kip Macy
2004-11-18 18:55 ` Keir Fraser
2004-11-18 19:16 ` Kip Macy
2004-11-18 18:15 ` Peri Hankey
2004-11-19 10:35 ` Jacob Gorm Hansen
2004-11-19 10:59 ` Keir Fraser
2004-11-19 12:02 ` Jacob Gorm Hansen
2004-11-19 14:50 ` Keir Fraser
2004-11-22 12:42 ` Jacob Gorm Hansen
2004-11-25 15:01 ` of cows and clones: creating domains as clones of saved state Peri Hankey
2004-11-25 21:19 ` Keir Fraser
2004-11-25 22:13 ` Peri Hankey
2004-11-25 22:36 ` Keir Fraser
2004-11-25 22:37 ` Ian Pratt
2004-11-16 18:10 ` copy on write memory Adam Heath
2004-11-16 18:09 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-16 18:39 ` Matt Ayres
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41992736.8040504@thegreen.co.uk \
--to=mpah@thegreen.co.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.