From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Serial Attached SCSI Driver Interface (SDI) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:47:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4199321F.4070309@pobox.com> References: <60807403EABEB443939A5A7AA8A7458B5C0F4F@otce2k01.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:47830 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261502AbUKOWsU (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:48:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <60807403EABEB443939A5A7AA8A7458B5C0F4F@otce2k01.adaptec.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Salyzyn, Mark" Cc: "Tuikov, Luben" , SCSI Mailing List , Eric.Moore@lsil.com Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > For a) design flaw, probably, but a cross-OS standard is still better > than nothing. One built-in design flaw is that a standard will > necessarily be a subset of the needs of the users and the various > management applications. also, one problem with cross-OS APIs is that they are a superset not a subset. Jeff