From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:56:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] is this scenario possible ??? Message-Id: <419C9C0F.8010000@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <20041116050157.29369.qmail@web50308.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041116050157.29369.qmail@web50308.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Andy Furniss wrote: > Drink Linux wrote: > >> hello . >> >> i have no problem shaping incoming traffic from WAN >> >> how do i shape outgoing traffic to WAN depending on >> the speed limit of each subnet .... >> >> ex: >> 10.10.6.0 --> 512kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD) >> 10.10.5.0 --> 256kbps (DOWNLOAD / UPLOAD) >> >> >> >> do i have to used forward handle, >> and used iptables -s 10.10.6.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 101 >> >> and used iptables -s 10.10.5.0/24 -d WAN -j MARK --set-mark 102 >> >> what do i really have to use? prerouting or postrouting. >> do i really need to use imq device on this one ? >> >> i can't seem to get it work ..... >> >> thanks for anyone can help... > > > It depends on your exact setup - what interfaces do you have to where? > i have eth0 connected to WAN and wlan0 connected to LAN .... i have tried to used postrouting with mark packets but failed .... You don't need IMQ as long as you only wan't to shape forwarded traffic. It should work in postrouting, I think your -d WAN is the problem, you need to specify interface -o eth0. As you are marking forwarded traffic you could use forward, and use -i as well as -o eg. iptables -t mangle -I FORWARD -i wlan0 -o eth0 -s 10.10.5.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 102 Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/