From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVA4c-0000jH-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:49:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CVA4a-0000i1-9Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:49:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVA4a-0000ho-2f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:49:16 -0500 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CV9vc-0007Zq-8y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:40:00 -0500 Message-ID: <419E063B.6040508@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:42:03 +0100 From: Christian Wiese MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BeOS 5.0.3 network problems References: <20041119140550.1739.qmail@maboque.srv.clix.pt> In-Reply-To: <20041119140550.1739.qmail@maboque.srv.clix.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org ruiapimenta@clix.pt wrote: >Totally off-topic: >What's the difference between "normal" and profiling? >Forgive my ignorance... > >Regards, >Rui > > If you run a program which is build with profiling enabled, the time is measured which was spend to execute different functions. This allows you to detect very time-consuming functions. As you may have noticed, BeOS in qEmu uses 100% of your host-cpu-time even if BeOS itself is idle (and uses HLT-instruction). With the use of a profiled-build I hope to identify the function which is "running wild".