diff for duplicates of <419EB699.4050204@yahoo.com.au> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 96053c7..811dbb1 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ Huh? How is not wanting to impact single threaded performance being > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:40:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > ->>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines = 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably +>>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines == 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably >>don't even care about 64K on their large machines, but... ->>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte = 4K per task for distro +>>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte == 4K per task for distro >>kernels. Not so good. > > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d47b947..673b3ca 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "ref\020041120030425.GF2714@holomorphy.com\0" "From\0Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>\0" "Subject\0Re: page fault scalability patch V11 [0/7]: overview\0" - "Date\0Sat, 20 Nov 2004 03:14:33 +0000\0" + "Date\0Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:14:33 +1100\0" "To\0William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>\0" "Cc\0Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>" torvalds@osdl.org @@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ "> \n" "> On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:40:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:\n" "> \n" - ">>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines = 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably\n" + ">>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines == 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably\n" ">>don't even care about 64K on their large machines, but...\n" - ">>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte = 4K per task for distro\n" + ">>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte == 4K per task for distro\n" ">>kernels. Not so good.\n" "> \n" "> \n" @@ -83,4 +83,4 @@ "As you can see though, Christoph ran into a wall at 8 CPUs, so\n" having them densly packed still might not be enough. -440ec5f75b4b09c0464ff1bede8958398a33404a0ce96fe699972e4b40273031 +e7abc5ec5a259423a336dd9a407b80c9b2fd653b2a3d53312902d0c24dcff049
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 96053c7..80e9e4f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ Huh? How is not wanting to impact single threaded performance being > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:40:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > ->>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines = 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably +>>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines == 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably >>don't even care about 64K on their large machines, but... ->>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte = 4K per task for distro +>>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte == 4K per task for distro >>kernels. Not so good. > > @@ -56,3 +56,8 @@ Huh? How is not wanting to impact single threaded performance being Hmm yeah I guess wouldn't put them all on different cachelines. As you can see though, Christoph ran into a wall at 8 CPUs, so having them densly packed still might not be enough. +-- +To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in +the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, +see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . +Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index d47b947..224d6a6 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "ref\020041120030425.GF2714@holomorphy.com\0" "From\0Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>\0" "Subject\0Re: page fault scalability patch V11 [0/7]: overview\0" - "Date\0Sat, 20 Nov 2004 03:14:33 +0000\0" + "Date\0Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:14:33 +1100\0" "To\0William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>\0" "Cc\0Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>" torvalds@osdl.org @@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ "> \n" "> On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:40:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:\n" "> \n" - ">>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines = 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably\n" + ">>1024 CPUs * 64 byte cachelines == 64K, no? Well I'm sure they probably\n" ">>don't even care about 64K on their large machines, but...\n" - ">>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte = 4K per task for distro\n" + ">>On i386 this would be maybe 32 * 128 byte == 4K per task for distro\n" ">>kernels. Not so good.\n" "> \n" "> \n" @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ "\n" "Hmm yeah I guess wouldn't put them all on different cachelines.\n" "As you can see though, Christoph ran into a wall at 8 CPUs, so\n" - having them densly packed still might not be enough. + "having them densly packed still might not be enough.\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" + "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" + "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" + "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"aart@kvack.org\"> aart@kvack.org </a>" -440ec5f75b4b09c0464ff1bede8958398a33404a0ce96fe699972e4b40273031 +df6815433d607233483f9aa0627143b46789f8d6e20c4a19f6d9a124269a61a5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.