From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAL58aIi029341 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:08:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAL5765J002654 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 05:07:07 GMT Message-ID: <41A022C6.8050100@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:08:22 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jwcart2@epoch.ncsc.mil CC: petre rodan , SELinux , Chris PeBenito Subject: Re: gentoo diff for snmpd References: <4198D752.2020405@gentoo.org> <1100808061.26930.18.camel@moss-lions.epoch.ncsc.mil> <419DF805.80002@gentoo.org> <1100893806.31793.29.camel@moss-lions.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1100893806.31793.29.camel@moss-lions.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov James Carter wrote: >I put an "ifdef(`distro_gentoo'" around all of these rules and merged >them. > > > Are you sure the proc_net changes are specific to gentoo? >On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 08:41, petre rodan wrote: > > >>Hi James, >> >>James Carter wrote: >> >> >>>Merged. >>> >>>Oops, there is no proc_net_t defined. >>>Petre, could you send me the proc_net_t stuff as well. >>> >>> >>please see the attachment. >> >> >> >>>On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 11:20, petre rodan wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>gentoo as a special context for /proc/net: >>>>genfscon proc /net system_u:object_r:proc_net_t >>>> >>>>so a small diff is needed for the snmpd policy. attached. >>>> >>>> >>bye, >>peter >> >> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.