From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guillaume Urbejtel <gurbejtel_test@m6.fr>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:25:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing / ip rule / fwmark
Message-Id: <41A22127.2020600@m6.fr>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <41A1C128.5060802@m6.fr>
In-Reply-To: <41A1C128.5060802@m6.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Its OK now,

The problem was the rp_filters...

Guillaume Urbejtel wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'm setting up a box with one default route and another handling only  
> web  connection.
> Here my conf  :
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 3
>
> 0:      from all lookup local
> 32766:  from all lookup main <- wich contain route to my lan and 
> internet inferfaces
> 32767:  from all fwmark        3 lookup webbox  <- wich contain only 
> the default route for wen traffic
> 32768:  from all lookup default <- which contain only the other 
> default route
>
> The problem : Packets to port 80 go tough the webbox thanks to fwmark 
> but the reply from webbox don't cross the fw...
> What's the reason ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> Guillaume from france
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/