Re: async vs. sync

[jehan procaccia <jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr>]

Lucky guys !
real    1m33.781s
and
tar xzf ~/tmp/httpd-2.0.52.tar.gz
real 0m25.522s
these are the kind of values I am expecting ... ( although in the 25s 
case I see that you din't used -v option of tar, which does waist lot of 
time ...) . I still cannot explain myself why I need async mode on the 
export server to appraoch these kind of performances ... ?

Nicolas.Kowalski@imag.fr wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, jehan procaccia wrote:
>
>> Anyone is getting the same performance as me in server sync mode ?, 
>> if someone could just tar xvfz any recent httpd.tar.gz file (nearly 
>> 3000 source files) and let me know how it take on their nfs 
>> configuration ?
>
>
> Using a 2.4.27 Linux client, without any options for the NFS mount, on 
> a 100Mbps network, I get this when untarring httpd-2.0.52.tar.gz:
>
> real    1m33.781s
> user    0m0.610s
> sys     0m0.980s
>
> Server information:
>
> - Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz, 1GB RAM, U160 73GB SCSI disks
>
> - Linux 2.4.27, XFS filesystems, quotas (user,group) on, no ACL, sync
>   exports.
>
> Regards.
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs