All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: P@draigBrady.com
To: mellia@prezzemolo.polito.it
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
	e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jorge Manuel Finochietto <jorge.finochietto@polito.it>,
	Giulio Galante <galante@polito.it>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:57:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A76085.7000105@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101484740.24742.213.camel@mellia.lipar.polito.it>

I forgot a smilely on my previous post
about not beleiving you. So here's 2: :-) :-)

Comments below:

Marco Mellia wrote:
> Robert,
> It a pleasure to hear from you.
> 
>> Touching the packet-data givs a major impact. See eth_type_trans
>> in all profiles.

Notice the e1000 sets up the alignment for IP by default.

> skb are de/allocated using standard kernel memory management. Still,
> without touching the packet, we can receive 100% of them.

I was doing some playing in this area this week.
I changed the alloc per packet to a "realloc" per packet.
I.E. the e1000 driver owns the packets. I noticed a
very nice speedup from this. In summary a userspace
app was able to receive 2x250Kpps without this patch,
and 2x490Kpps with it. The patch is here:
http://www.pixelbeat.org/tmp/linux-2.4.20-pb.diff
Note 99% of that patch is just upgrading from
e1000 V4.4.12-k1 to V5.2.52 (which doesn't affect
the performance).

Wow I just read you're excellent paper, and noticed
you used this approach also :-)

>> Small packet performance is dependent on low latency. Higher bus speed
>> gives shorter latency but also on higher speed buses there use to be  
>> bridges that adds latency.
> 
> That's true. We suspect that the limit is due to bus latency. But still,
> we are surprised, since the bus allows to receive 100%, but to transmit
> up to ~50%. Moreover the raw aggerate bandwidth of the buffer is _far_
> larger (133MHz*64bit ~ 8gbit/s

Well there definitely could be an asymmetry wrt bus latency.
Saying that though, in my tests with much the same hardware
as you, I could only get 800Kpps into the driver. I'll
check this again when I have time. Note also that as I understand
it the PCI control bus is running at a much lower rate,
and that is used to arbitrate the bus for each packet.
I.E. the 8Gb/s number above is not the bottleneck.

An lspci -vvv for your ethernet devices would be useful
Also to view the burst size: setpci -d 8086:1010 e6.b
(where 8086:1010 is the ethernet device PCI id).

cheers,
Pádraig.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-26 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1101467291.24742.70.camel@mellia.lipar.polito.it>
2004-11-26 14:05 ` [E1000-devel] Transmission limit P
2004-11-26 15:31   ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-26 19:56     ` jamal
2004-11-29 14:21       ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-30 13:46         ` jamal
2004-12-02 17:24           ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-26 20:06     ` jamal
2004-11-26 20:56     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-26 21:02       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-27  9:25     ` Harald Welte
     [not found]       ` <20041127111101.GC23139@xi.wantstofly.org>
2004-11-27 11:31         ` Harald Welte
2004-11-27 20:12       ` Cesar Marcondes
2004-11-29  8:53       ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-29 14:50         ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-30  8:42           ` Marco Mellia
2004-12-01 12:25             ` jamal
2004-12-02 13:39               ` Marco Mellia
2004-12-03 13:07                 ` jamal
2004-11-26 15:40   ` Robert Olsson
2004-11-26 15:59     ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-26 16:57       ` P [this message]
2004-11-26 20:01         ` jamal
2004-11-29 10:19           ` P
2004-11-29 13:09           ` Robert Olsson
2004-11-29 20:16             ` David S. Miller
2004-12-01 16:47               ` Robert Olsson
2004-11-30 13:31             ` jamal
2004-11-30 13:46               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-30 14:25                 ` jamal
2004-12-01  0:11                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-01  1:09                     ` Scott Feldman
2004-12-01 15:34                       ` Robert Olsson
2004-12-01 16:49                         ` Scott Feldman
2004-12-01 17:37                           ` Robert Olsson
2004-12-02 17:54                           ` Robert Olsson
2004-12-02 18:23                           ` Robert Olsson
2004-12-02 23:25                             ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-03  5:23                             ` Scott Feldman
2004-12-10 16:24                             ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-01 18:29                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-01 21:35                         ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-02  6:13                           ` Scott Feldman
2004-12-03 13:24                             ` jamal
2004-12-05 14:50                             ` 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit) Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 15:03                               ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 15:15                                 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 15:19                                   ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 15:30                                     ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 17:00                                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 17:11                                         ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 17:38                                           ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 18:14                                             ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 15:42                                 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 16:48                                   ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 17:01                                     ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-05 17:58                                     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 17:44                                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 17:51                                     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-05 17:54                                       ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-06 11:32                                         ` 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: " jamal
2004-12-06 12:11                                           ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-06 12:20                                             ` jamal
2004-12-06 12:23                                               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-06 12:30                                                 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-12-06 13:11                                                   ` jamal
     [not found]                                                     ` <20041206132907.GA13411@xi.wantstofly.org>
     [not found]                                                       ` <16820.37049.396306.295878@robur.slu.se>
2004-12-06 17:32                                                         ` 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] " P
2004-12-08 23:36                                   ` Ray Lehtiniemi
     [not found]                                     ` <41B825A5.2000009@draigBrady.com>
     [not found]                                       ` <20041209161825.GA32454@mail.com>
2004-12-09 17:12                                         ` 1.03Mpps on e1000 P
     [not found]                                         ` <20041209164820.GB32454@mail.com>
2004-12-09 17:19                                           ` P
2004-12-09 23:25                                             ` Ray Lehtiniemi
2004-12-05 21:12                                 ` 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit) Scott Feldman
2004-12-05 21:25                                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-06  1:23                                     ` 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: " Scott Feldman
2004-12-02 17:31                       ` [E1000-devel] Transmission limit Marco Mellia
2004-12-03 20:57                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-04 10:36                         ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-12-01 12:08                     ` jamal
2004-12-01 15:24                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-26 17:58       ` Robert Olsson
2004-11-27 20:00   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-29 12:44     ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-29 15:19       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-29 17:32         ` Marco Mellia
2004-11-29 19:08           ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-11-29 19:09             ` Lennert Buytenhek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41A76085.7000105@draigBrady.com \
    --to=p@draigbrady.com \
    --cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=galante@polito.it \
    --cc=jorge.finochietto@polito.it \
    --cc=mellia@prezzemolo.polito.it \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.