From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: ULOG / netlink errors Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:50:04 +0100 Message-ID: <41AA39FC.1000400@eurodev.net> References: <20041128113728.GA17226@oasis.frogfoot.net> <41AA3723.9070708@eurodev.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Return-path: To: Abraham van der Merwe In-Reply-To: <41AA3723.9070708@eurodev.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Pablo Neira wrote: > this is ok, it's always a good idea to reduce the probability of an > overflow. But I think that you'll have problems anyway with traffers > rates bigger than ~20 Mbits/s. well, this is true in ip_queue, don't know in ipt_ULOG, it depends on three/four parameters. -- Pablo