From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:53:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] SEPARATING VOIP AND SURFING Message-Id: <41AB9A5C.1000109@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <20041109175203.11372.qmail@web41524.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041109175203.11372.qmail@web41524.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Ricardo Soria wrote: > --- Andy Furniss > escribi=F3:=20 >=20 >>Andy Furniss wrote: >> >> >>>>So, my question would be, how to 'divide' or >>>>'recognize' incoming and outgoing traffic, and to >>>>treat it as different channels?? I was thinking >> >>about >> >>>>using a IMQ device for incoming traffic, but this >>>>apperas to be a 'little bit' more complicated >> >>that >> >>>>what I expected. So, may it be a way to do this >>>>without installing IMQ ?? >>> >>> >>>Yes you will need IMQ. >> >>Second thoughts - you may be able to do without IMQ >>as long as it's just=20 >>forwarded traffic. >> >>Andy. >> >>=20 >=20 >=20 > Andy: >=20 > What I am exactly doing is this: I receive all > traffic from the cisco 1600, then, > filter/shape/monitor it, then, if this traffic is > destined to the remote subnet, it is send to the cisco > 827, but, if the traffic is for the local subnet > (including both ciscos, and the linux box), The only thing you would need IMQ for is if you need to shape traffic=20 from the 1600 to a local process on the linux box - so you may - it=20 depends on what else you are running on the shaping box that causes bulk=20 traffic to it. it is > directly delivered to its destination. All of this is > done via eth0, as much outgoing as incoming traffic.=20 > So, specially cosidering about the local subnet, do > you think I should definitively use IMQ or not?? If eth0 has as much incoming as outgoing then there is no traffic to=20 local process? Do you want to shape eth0 aswell as the internet link or is it OK for=20 spare bandwidth? Andy. >=20 > However, I have also posted in linuximq list, because > I cannot find IMQ patch for my linux box (Redhat 7.3, > 2.4.18-3 Kernel) >=20 > Very thanks in advance. >=20 > Ricardo. >=20 > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Informaci=F3n de Estados Unidos y Am=E9rica Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. > Vis=EDtanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com >=20 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/