From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:39:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] SEPARATING VOIP AND SURFING Message-Id: <41ABDD78.2010007@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: <20041109175203.11372.qmail@web41524.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041109175203.11372.qmail@web41524.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Ricardo Soria wrote: > > There may be traffic for a local (linux box) process, > but the most of the traffic will be redirected or > passed. > > >>Do you want to shape eth0 aswell as the internet >>link or is it OK for >>spare bandwidth? >> > > > I cannot translate/understand perfectly this question, > but I do need to shape the internet link. I didn't know if there was other (LAN) traffic that needed shaping aswell as internet traffic. > > So, returning to the question that originated this > discussion, how can I diferentiate/separate incoming > and outgoing traffic for the same interface (eth0), > without confusing each other, and without using IMQ > devices if possible ?? If bulk transfers from internet to shaping box are rare enough for you not to care about them, then you can do without IMQ. As for seperating traffic - in prerouting you should be able to mark traffic by source MAC address (1600) and the same in postrouting for destination MAC. You could then use the marks to send to different HTB classes that don't share. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/